I can approve of the sci/tech center and the agricultural sciences center expansion. That said, holy mother of fuck, 70m for a HIGH SCHOOL stadium? Fut the whuck.
Sections of an op-ed Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul wrote on mandatory minimums in The Washington Times in September appear nearly identical to an article by Dan Stewart of The Week
that ran a week earlier. The discovery comes amid reports from BuzzFeed
that Paul plagiarized in his book and in several speeches.
Paul also delivered testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 16, 2013, that included the copied sections.
So, does this make him a moocher or a looter? Please Republicans, please nominate this ridiculous clown show as your 2016 pick for the White House.
PS, why didn't anyone in the Village figure out Rand Paul was lifting speeches and policy positions wholesale from other authors before, or were you too busy regaling the world with how awesome and principled the guy is?
2 Comments
Close this window Jump to comment form:: solidarity fist pump ::
November 5, 2013 at 7:55 PM
I can approve of the sci/tech center and the agricultural sciences center expansion. That said, holy mother of fuck, 70m for a HIGH SCHOOL stadium? Fut the whuck.
November 5, 2013 at 10:37 PM