Ah yes, the ol' "any Palomino is a pal-o'-mine-o" defense. Bet if one of us tried to sue SPLC you'd get the same treatment
September 15, 2014 at 4:54 AM
Anonymous said...
A more likely explanation is that there's something in their files that if it came to light in court it would be damaging to the present administration.
September 15, 2014 at 6:29 AM
Paul X said...
"United Against Nuclear Iran"? Not a group with government (or crony) connections? Don't make me laugh.
That means, by definition, something the Iranian group has found out (and turned over to the US Gov), but the administration has not admitted, or has taken credit for, or has lied to cover up.
"“If there’s something in their files that would disclose a state secret, is there any reason it should be in their files?”"
4 Comments -
Ah yes, the ol' "any Palomino is a pal-o'-mine-o" defense. Bet if one of us tried to sue SPLC you'd get the same treatment
September 15, 2014 at 4:54 AM
A more likely explanation is that there's something in their files that if it came to light in court it would be damaging to the present administration.
September 15, 2014 at 6:29 AM
"United Against Nuclear Iran"? Not a group with government (or crony) connections? Don't make me laugh.
September 16, 2014 at 11:22 AM
That means, by definition, something the Iranian group has found out (and turned over to the US Gov), but the administration has not admitted, or has taken credit for, or has lied to cover up.
Pick one.
September 16, 2014 at 9:37 PM