Google-Apps
Hauptmenü

Post a Comment On: Ken Shirriff's blog

"Inside Intel's first product: the 3101 RAM chip held just 64 bits"

6 Comments -

1 – 6 of 6
Blogger Unknown said...

Wow I'm first!
Thanks for another great article.
Congratulations for being the (probably) first person to publish high-res, multi-layer images of this rare chip to the internet.
The 3101 is one of the simplest implementations of static ram arrays, since it holds only 64 bits and (almost) no other frills. It is a classic example of the bit-slice TTL processors from the period. You did a wonderful job of explaining it. Keep of the posts!

July 12, 2017 at 4:26 PM

Blogger Michele said...

What a great exposition of this interesting chip. I didn't know the Alto had four of these in it. Now all you need to do is run Sil on the Alto to create a 3101 layout thereby closing the circle.

July 30, 2017 at 5:45 PM

Blogger Mattis Lind said...

Your reverse engineering articles are amazing! The detail, the photos. Everything. Thanks! A suggestion for a chip to reverse engineer next time is the Western Digital UART TR1402. As far as I understand the first integrated UART. BTW, the PDP-11/05 computer also used Intel 3101 (or TI SN7489), probably a very widely used SPM in many minicomputers of that era.

August 17, 2017 at 12:49 AM

Blogger Tony K said...

The fact that large swathes of modern processors consist of various levels of cache means that Intel is, once again, a manufacturer of (static) RAM. Great article.

September 3, 2017 at 3:30 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, Intel's first RAM chip held only 63 bits. There was a mistake peeling the Rubylith so one address was inop. See "Recollections of Early Chip Development at Intel", Andrew M. Volk, Peter A. Stoll, and Paul Metrovich.

September 29, 2017 at 11:58 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The initial contents of this RAM are usually zero. Does this chip have a dedicated memory initialization circuit?

August 15, 2019 at 4:04 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot