Google-Apps
Hauptmenü

Post a Comment On: Ken Shirriff's blog

"Reverse-engineering a vintage OR/NOR chip"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Blogger DT said...

Thanks for yet another interesting post.

Typo: Footnote two says "twice the resistance", twice.

April 24, 2021 at 11:27 AM

Blogger CuriousMarc said...

Do you know what's the advantage of using a constant current source in the emitters instead of just a resistor as in typical ECL?

April 24, 2021 at 11:24 PM

Blogger Toivo Henningsson said...

I imagine that a current source in the form of a current mirror could be smaller than a load resistor. But I don't know if that applies to the current source design used here.

Functionally, I would imagine that a current sink makes the circuit behave as intended over a wider range of Vin1, Vin2.

April 29, 2021 at 11:27 PM

Blogger Ken Shirriff said...

Marc, the Motorola Databook discusses the advantages of the constant current source for ECL (p2). Older Motorola ECL chips (MECL 10K) used a resistor for the emitter current. But for the 10KH series, they added a voltage regulator and constant current source.

"The constant current source allows the use of matched collector resistors which produces better matched delays, matched output tracking rates with temperature and less variation in the output voltage level with changes in the power supply. There is also a considerable improvement in noise margins over MECL 10K."

For differential receivers, "the constant current source employed in the emitter node of the differential pair allows the increase in common mode rejection."

May 4, 2021 at 3:19 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot