Google-apper
Hovedmeny

Post a Comment On: Ken Shirriff's blog

"Reverse-engineering an airspeed/Mach indicator from 1977"

5 Comments -

1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A really minor nit in the grand scheme of things, which does not detract much from the article: you mention that "The air data computer measures the static and dynamic air pressure from pitot tubes and determines the airspeed, Mach number, altitude, and other parameters."

This isn't entirely true.

Static air pressure is normally measured by ambient air pressure (in the case of an unpressurized cabin, such as one might see on small propeller planes but almost certainly not ones where Mach speed indication is of any real value) or through an external static air port (in the case of pressurized cabins).

Dynamic air pressure is measured through the pitot tube(s).

Static air pressure provides for example barometric altitude such as that indicated by a typical aviation (barometric) altimeter, which in its simplest form really is just an air pressure instrument with a reversed scale (lower air pressure gives higher indicated value). The difference between static and dynamic air pressure provides airspeed data; a greater difference between the two is represented by a greater indicated air speed reading.

There have been aviation accidents where the cause was a clogged-up pitot tube, which basically causes the airspeed indicator to function as an extremely crude and highly inaccurate altimeter.

January 12, 2023 at 1:06 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

Sperry Avionics had a plant at 5353 W. Bell Road in Glendale, AZ (a suburb of Phoenix). An acquaintance was a draftsman there in the early 80's. I don't know how long the avionics people occupied the building after being acquired but AAA of Northern California occupies the building now. Honeywell Aerospace has several facilities in the Phoenix area including one a few miles away near Deer Valley Airport.

January 12, 2023 at 6:00 PM

Blogger The Happy Engineer said...

There is a Youtube channel callel Le labo de Michel, where he reverse engineers and operates a lot of avionics instruments.

January 12, 2023 at 10:49 PM

Blogger Brian of Romsey said...

"voltage regulators.[reference] Instead" A missing foot note reference perhaps? Could be a source or compilation error.

January 13, 2023 at 3:03 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ken,

You saId "The op amp also receives a feedback signal from the motor output. I don't entirely understand this signal, which goes through a filter circuit with resistors, diodes, and a capacitor. I think it dampens the motor signal so the motor doesn't overshoot the desired position."

This is mainly the required feedback around the opamp that sets the gain. Otherwise the you are dealing withe open loop gain of the opamp which is very high. Just like in the other opamp, the buffer, the output is tied back into the inverting input, this sets the closed loop gain to 1. So if they put that feedback on the output of the opamp /before the output transistors, that is all it would be. But they moved it to the output of the drivers, the then helps correct non-linear response from the drivers as well as set the closed loop gain

Simple negative feedback around an amp. In this case the whole amp of the opamp and the driver transistors.

January 13, 2023 at 6:51 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot