Google-Apps
Hauptmenü

Post a Comment On: Ken Shirriff's blog

"Inside the Apollo Guidance Computer's core memory"

11 Comments -

1 – 11 of 11
Blogger Richard said...

Friend, Awesome !!!

I am facing the best technology history website.

This article is from Dreams!

How do you do that?

Thank you very much for making this excellent material available.

January 29, 2019 at 2:27 PM

Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by the author.

January 30, 2019 at 7:37 AM

Blogger chutipascal said...

I'm overloaded with so much information (warniings 1201, 1202 both), thanks Ken.

January 30, 2019 at 7:41 AM

Blogger Keith said...

Could you take two X-rays from slightly different angles, and make a stereoscopic pair? This would make the layers stand out much more clearly. I realise it wouldn't fit the entire module in one picture, but even a closeup 3D look at the middle of the module would be informative.

January 31, 2019 at 5:37 AM

Anonymous Charles A Williamson said...

I worked at Ampex Computer Products Division in Culver City from January 1964 until about 1971 in manufacturing. It was in the hay day of core memories. We built many core memory planes and stacks for a verity of companies. We did not do any work for the Apollo program but we did some for companies that supported the Space Program including some that were installed in the launch complex building upon which the missile was installed. I have first hand knowledge of the manufacturing methods used to stabilize the core memory planes from he effects of vibration. The plane would test ok before encapsulating but some would fail afterward. It turned out that the routing of the sense wires was critical. They could not be tightly twisted and only a loose twist would work. Many hours of rework occurred be for I was able to solve the problem.

Your article brought back a lot of memories

February 4, 2019 at 1:40 PM

Anonymous Duane K. said...

Since one of the bits of each data word is parity, could you synthesize replacement data on the fly for the bad bit from the other 15?

Interesting sleuthing on historic hardware. Good luck!

February 6, 2019 at 9:45 PM

Blogger DHess said...

No, parity would indicate an error but there is no way of telling which bit including the parity bit is wrong.

February 13, 2019 at 7:09 PM

Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by the author.

April 8, 2019 at 10:21 AM

Blogger Ken Shirriff said...

Duane K: Yes, as you suggest we can use the parity bit to synthesize a replacement for the bad bit. However, we're thinking of changing the wiring so the parity bit replaces the bad bit, and then we just disable parity checking. I wouldn't want to fly to the moon this way, but it should be good enough.

April 22, 2019 at 6:54 PM

Blogger Zom-B said...

@Keith To make a stereoscopic pair you actually have to move the camera sideways ~6cm and not change the angle. If you change the angle then horizontal lines become slanted and your eyes have a harder time to find a depth-point because the lines are shifted vertically.

April 23, 2019 at 1:54 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

There are plenty of problems with this memory (the output transistor of the sense amplifier is incorrectly mounted), but I can cite an important one: On the secondary of the tranformer between the sense line selection and the sense amplifier there should be a RC circuit which allows to memorize the sense input which is very short; all the core rope memories have one, it is absolutely mandatory, otherwise the reading logic does not have the time to read the sense input, that's what the transformer is for: Transform the short sense input into a temporary permanent one (the RC circuit is discharged for the next reading).

October 31, 2021 at 9:56 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot