Google-apper
Hovedmeny

Post a Comment On: Ken Shirriff's blog

"555 timer teardown: inside the world's most popular IC"

20 Comments -

1 – 20 of 20
Blogger electronicsguy said...

Excellent work Ken! Have been using the 555 for 25 years now. Always wondered how it looked like inside :)

February 20, 2016 at 6:32 PM

Blogger Unknown said...

Great article - I enjoyed it.

Slight editing error (I presume) where you state:

"Given the popularity of the 555, it's surprising that it has several rookie design flaws: According to its designer, it has several rookie design flaws:"

February 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM

Blogger Joao Miguel said...

Nice article! Good to know the early times of IC design!

February 22, 2016 at 6:50 PM

Blogger Jacques said...

very interesting!

as for: "The continuing success of the original 555 and the failure of the improved successor can be viewed as an example of the worse is better principle."

I would attribute this failure to poor marketing. The fact is that modern CMOS version of the 555 are successfull.

February 23, 2016 at 8:15 AM

Anonymous bite said...

Hi,

I'm glad to see some analog IC reverse engineering stuff.
Last year, i tried to reverse the ne556 (there is a nice picture of it from zeptobar: http://zeptobars.com/en/read/stm-ne556-555) and i wasnt able to identify transistor type (pnp/npn). I had no clue for that, so i just ignored the type then tried to eliminate the "impossibru" design with hypothesis (yeah, painful).
As far as i known the circular shape of emitter is for compensating device mismatch between transistors. NPN can also have circular emitter. Or am i wrong?

Btw, the device layout of Q21 looks like a diode?
For me, this shit looks like that

February 23, 2016 at 2:55 PM

Blogger Eric Wilner said...

Cool!
I haven't used an actual 555 in a long time; nowadays, in the interest of reduced component count and board space, I end up sending a cheap little MCU to do a 555's job (well, a 555 or maybe a 556 plus passives plus a couple of gates).
Downside of the MCU: with a real analog timer and discrete gates, I'd never have to wonder where-the-heck that stray trailing pulse is coming from. Or, worst case, I could probe the workings with a scope and see what was happening.

February 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

useful and interesting for any student from computer engineering or electronics, for high school only at geeks and hackers section

February 29, 2016 at 8:17 AM

Blogger Ken Shirriff said...

"bite": on the chips I've seen, NPN transistors are usually rectangular and PNP are usually round, because NPN transistors are vertical while PNP transistors are lateral with the base and collector surrounding the emitter. (I'm using "The Art of Analog Layout" page 80 as a reference.) But I don't know if that's true in the 556 you're looking at.

As for Q21, yes it looks like a diode. This is one of the components I puzzled over for a while, since a diode doesn't make sense in the circuit but there's not obvious collector. After looking closely, I think what's happening is there's no isolation "moat" between Q21 and Q22 so they share the same N region connected to Vcc. In other words, Q22's Vcc-to-collector connection also serves as Q21's Vcc-to-collector connection.

March 18, 2016 at 10:39 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

Folks at Zeptobars posted nice hi-res die-shot of 555 http://zeptobars.com/en/read/national-semiconductor-LMC555
Probably inspired by your excellent write-up. Thanks!.

March 22, 2016 at 4:45 PM

Anonymous bite said...

@KenShirriff: oh ok right. But you point out another question I always had. Sometimes the N-region (or epitaxial layer) is polarized, in this circuit the whole resistors share the same N-region with Q22 and Q21. What's the purpose of this? For the resistors it's ok, it will reverse bias parasitic diodes but about q22/q21, i have no idea :(
Your book looks like good but a bit expensive :D
My ref. is currently "Bipolar and MOS Analog Circuit Design", it's not bad, I didn't found a better one.

April 3, 2016 at 8:08 AM

Blogger Ken Shirriff said...

Hi bite, thanks for the comment. I don't know why the resistors and Q21/Q22 share the N region. Maybe it was convenient for layout? Thanks for your book recommendation - I'll take a look. By the way, Amazon has a used copy of "The Art of Analog Layout" for $13.88.

April 3, 2016 at 11:58 AM

Blogger willg said...

Excellent work mate, so glad I found this site! Thank you for the hard work involved in making such a great page. Don't worry I won't be pointing out what I "think" is an "editing error".
Lmao... I often wonder what needs to happen in someones life to make them do foolish things to someone they have never even met....

Thanks again!!

October 9, 2016 at 10:51 AM

Blogger Unknown said...

Wonderful stuff. I am old enough to remember its introduction and have used it many times in my designs over the years. Also fallen into the "crowbar" trap presented with the bipolar versions, especially when working within circuits containing counters or processors etc. where without adequate precautions the 555 will present a microscopic short on the supply rails at switch over and create havoc. Also found it useful as an auto reset device for remote processor based systems (by remote I mean physically remote as in some weather stations) If you gate the address / data lines into a 555 configured as a "missing pulse detector" then should the system freeze, the output of the 555 can be used to perform a reset hopefully restoring function to the system.

June 22, 2017 at 6:23 PM

Anonymous Johnny Vanderford said...

This is an amazing website. The interactive die and schematic was my personal favorite. I teach semiconductor fab and packaging classes (die attach and wire bonding) at Lorain County Community College in Elyria, OH and we use the 555 for so many circuits. It's such a versatile circuit. Thank you for putting this together. I will be sharing this with my current classes and my remaining classes as long as it's online. Many thanks and cheers. ~Johnny Vanderford jvanderford@lorainccc.edu www.lcccmems.com

November 13, 2018 at 1:24 PM

Anonymous Richi said...

I have done a lot of pictures of different 555 dies.
If you are interested: www.richis-lab.de/555.htm
The comments are in german language but google translator is your friend and of course the pictures are international! :)

May 1, 2019 at 8:47 AM

Blogger Алексей Фурман said...

One of the best famous IC of the world. Still in use.

October 15, 2019 at 6:50 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I do remember time when 555 was too expensive and exotic for everyday use. There was standard way to implement same functionality with NANDs using all the gates in SN7400, but cannot find it now in the Interwebbs. Especially when Russians started to make 7400 look-a-likes with 2 millimeter pin spacing.

June 5, 2020 at 6:40 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

50 years, you can still buy and use it these days!

September 18, 2020 at 6:53 AM

Blogger orgwood65@gmail.com said...

I joined Magic Dot around 1972 and we were using a modified 555 for our touch switch that Hans had changed the top metal layer for our needs. I met with him later as we were designing an IC for an encoded keyboard version. I believe I still have a wafer of the 555 or the modified version that we used.

March 29, 2021 at 8:42 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out these Quantum diamond microscope images of the same die:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.11473.pdf

January 24, 2022 at 4:20 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot