Google apps
Main menu

Post a Comment On: Doug Ross @ Journal

"GUEST POST: The Illegal Actions of our Autocratic President"

4 Comments -

1 – 4 of 4
Anonymous Mike in Grasonville said...

This is roughly the 14th time this President has flouted the Constitution, all without repercussions. Why?

Because the Republicans are scared to death to bring up charges on a Black President. A white one maybe, but certainly not the first black one.

The Supreme Court will not step into this matter, as they apparently hold Constitutionuion in disregard as well.

My feeling is the military should step in, as they are sworn to upholConstitutionituion, the Generals be damned. Or, perhaps it's time for the people to "step in". Either one works for me.

10:15 PM

Anonymous TheFineReport.com said...

Thank goodness for John Boehner and the brave knights of the GOP.

1:15 AM

Anonymous Mt Top Patriot said...

At least the chocolate emperor publicly graced us with his acknowledgement of how omnipotent he is and passed a new law at a press conference last Thursday.

We should be blessed and get on our knee's, bow down and worship obama for taking the time, I mean between being serviced by his male concubines, fellatio is something that should not be rushed, golf, cocaine, and going over his daily script with vallery jarret, the guy has a lot on his plate.

Most kings, emperors, and demi-gods, they have a certain fondness for their subjects. I guess a one year extension is manna from our GOTUS, (God Of The United States), our king can always use an extra year in order to determine if there is any wealth among the little people he and his court missed.

Remember, the serfs of olde England had the long bow, serfs in Amerika have the AR.

6:31 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My problem with the majority of most recent presidents is their tendency to issue "signing statements" when signing bills. The "signing statement" is nothing more nor less than an announcement of presidential intent not to enforce all or part of a law. That is not constitutional. George Bush did it all the time. It is illegal, impeachable and wrong. The constitution provides the only methods of dealing with a law the president doesn't like. a) Veto; b) send it back to congress with an explanation as to what he objects to. Congress then has three choices: a) make the changes; b) override the veto; or c) abandon the matter. That's it. Any of the other actions are unconstitutional. Obviously too complex for a "constitutional scholar."

8:54 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot