Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Coder's Log

"New in Boxes 3.8"

20 Comments -

1 – 20 of 20
Anonymous antistress said...

Hi, i tried Boxes 3.6.2 on Debian Sid since i wanted to run Windows XP :
1° only a file can be selected, not the original CD-ROM. I had to create an ISO file [1] which is a severe limitation.
2° i was never able to valid the licence number and got that message "(gnome-boxes:10674): Boxes-WARNING **: wizard.vala:357: Failed to create storage pool: invalid connection pointer in virStoragePoolDefineXML"

Very disappointed, specially since Boxes looks great and simple to use :-/

[1] sudo dd if=/dev/sr0 of=file.iso bs=2048 conv=notrunc

March 20, 2013 at 3:36 AM

Anonymous antistress said...

Also, does Boxes handles Firewire ? Thanks

March 20, 2013 at 3:39 AM

Blogger jimmac said...

Great screenshot for USB redirection ;)

March 20, 2013 at 4:07 AM

Blogger stuaxo said...

Hi,
Will it show the existing VMs I already have, without importing. (E.G. I have a bunch already setup that show up in virtualbox + can view them with this extension:

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/308/virtualbox-vm-search-provider/

Cheers

March 20, 2013 at 5:10 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Awesome! Just, awesome !!!
I have waited usb redirection and "copy&paste between host and VM" for a while :D
Smartcard support will be very helpful for me too.

Thank you for your work :)

March 20, 2013 at 5:13 AM

Anonymous eyome said...

Awesome! Just, awesome !!!
I have waited usb redirection and "copy&paste between host and VM" for a while :D
Smartcard support will be very helpful for me too.

Thank you for your work :)

March 20, 2013 at 5:14 AM

Blogger zeenix said...

antistress,

1. CDROM should appear in UI with libosinfo's udev rule properly installed. You might have to install an additional package on Debian (at least in ubuntu you have to). In coming releases of libosinfo/udev, you won't need that anymore.

Besides you can choose /dev/sr0 as the file. You'll need permission to CDROM device though.

2. About the 2nd issue, try 'virsh pool-destroy gnome-boxes && virsh pool-undefine gnome-boxes'. If that doesn't help, please file a bug (though its a bit too late for 3.6 as 3.8 is about to be released and 3.6 will be unmaintained after that).

March 20, 2013 at 2:28 PM

Blogger zeenix said...

antistress, No firewall support, sorry!

stuaxo, If virtual box uses libvirt. Yes. If it uses session libvirt (per-user), Boxes will show them out of the box. If it uses system libvirt, you'll need to add the connection yourself. There has been a long standing bug about it: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666185

Although we now know what exactly we need to do about it but suffice is to say that we wont be able to fix this in 3.8 cycle.

March 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

@zeenix

Thanks for your answers

1°) I tried "virsh pool-destroy gnome-boxes && virsh pool-undefine gnome-boxes" and got :
"error: Failed to reconnect to the hypervisor
error: no valid connection
error: Failed to connect socket to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': Connexion refusée"

I'll try again later when Boxes 3.8 will be available in Debian experimental

2°) i meant Firewire aka IEEE 1394 or i.LINK. Is it supported within Boxes ?

March 20, 2013 at 2:55 PM

Blogger zeenix said...

1. Did you run that command as root? Boxes is supposed to run as normal user and it connects to session libvirt. If you ran it as normal user, libvirt installation is likely broken on your machine/distro and 3.8 won't fix that. :(

2. We don't have any special support for firewire. If it works out of the box with libvirt + qemu then it should just work in Boxes too.

March 20, 2013 at 3:05 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

@zeenix: i tried both as user and root with the same result :-/ I will try again once v3.8 will be in Debian experimental and if it still doesn't work i will write a bug report. Thanks

March 21, 2013 at 3:52 AM

Blogger zeenix said...

antistress, Great. If you get the same error from virsh, please file the bug on Debian.

March 21, 2013 at 5:38 AM

Blogger Crixer13 said...

So beautiful UI, GNOME is my preferred desktops since i had 9 years old.

Also i wan't to know if these widgets specially the sidebar are available for Gtkmm and Glade. Thanks.

March 21, 2013 at 5:20 PM

Blogger zeenix said...

Crixer13, From glade? no. These are not really widgets but mix of Clutter actors and Gtk widgets to get the animations possible.

March 21, 2013 at 5:53 PM

Anonymous acronym said...

Amazing ! This is cool!

June 8, 2013 at 11:48 AM

Anonymous Vernell said...

This is cool!

July 17, 2013 at 3:54 AM

Anonymous antistress said...

@zeenix : Ok, i've finally managaed to try Boxes 3.8 from Debian repositories and all my problems vanished :)
Very very very nice peace of software, I'm very impressed by its easeasiness : that's viurtualisation for children :)

November 9, 2013 at 2:10 AM

Anonymous antistress said...

Hi again. I'm running Debian Sid 64 bits with Boxes 3.8.4.

Using a USB flash drive, it shows up on my GNU/Linux Host system but not on my Windows XP SP3 Guest system.

However, in Boxes, "Redirect new USB" is ON, like my USB flash drive (which is listed under the "USB Devices" section)

With Windows, I can't see it by clicking the icon in notification area which shows USB devices that can be deactivated nor by displaying the "My Computer" window.

(Next step I'd like to use Boxes to update maps on my GPS device but its dedicated software requires Windows)

January 24, 2014 at 2:25 AM

Anonymous antistress said...

I get this error in Terminal, could this be related ?
(gnome-boxes:16654): GSpice-WARNING **: Warning no automount-inhibiting implementation available

Tell me I have to report the bug thanks

January 24, 2014 at 6:16 AM

Anonymous antistress said...

(I've filled Bug 723188)

January 29, 2014 at 2:14 PM

Please no insults to anyone
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot