Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"Interna"

8 Comments -

1 – 8 of 8
Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by the author.

11:59 AM, May 01, 2013

Blogger Zephir said...

Ms Lara is getting more and more similar to Bee every day...;-)

12:02 PM, May 01, 2013

Blogger Anonymous Snowboarder said...

Bee - I think the fires have an early start in Cali this year too. Good call.

11:22 PM, May 01, 2013

Blogger Sabine Hossenfelder said...

Hi Snowboarder,

Yeah, when I think of SB in late August, what comes to my mind first is the view North from the mountains into the countryside, with the dry grass a meter high, square mile after square mile. It isn't hard to imagine what a single spark can do in this situation :/ Best,

B.

3:54 AM, May 02, 2013

Blogger Giotis said...

I don't believe you Sabine...

You are invited to one of the top institutes in US to participate in a workshop about the hottest topic in theoretical physics these days, and you decline??

Important people will notice you there and this would be benefit your career for sure. You should reconsider; I'm telling you this as a friend:-)

Unless you think you belong to a certain camp and the firewall business is an illusion of the people belonging to ST camp.

If this is the case I disagree; physics is one discipline and there are no camps.

1:31 PM, May 03, 2013

Blogger Sabine Hossenfelder said...

Hi Giotis,

I find it interesting you don't believe me for two reasons.

First, you evidently think the reasons you name matter more to me than the reasons I listed in my post above. Let me rephrase it this way: I don't like to waste my time, and I don't believe this discussion is going to lead to progress on the issue of quantum gravity, so why should I spend more time on it than I already have? It's a criticism on a solution to the information loss problem (bh complementarity) that I never believed in to begin with. I am primarily interested in the topic because I think the issue they pointed out tells us something new about the breakdown of the semi-classical approximation if dealing with a heavily entangled state, but then I'm in the business of phenomenology and that interest is rather peripheral.

Second, it is interesting that you evidently believe I would publicly lie.

Besides this, I didn't actually decline, I just didn't reply to the invitation. (To my shame, after I previously expressed interest. But then, I am very sure they'll have absolutely no problem to fill seats in the room.)

Best,

B.

4:23 AM, May 04, 2013

Blogger Giotis said...

I didn't say you are lying!

"I don't believe you" is an oral expression meaning I find it very strange that you didn't accept.

Sorry it 'sounded' like this but I guess these are the shortcomings of written language...

5:28 AM, May 04, 2013

Blogger Sabine Hossenfelder said...

Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding. Best,

B.

1:04 PM, May 04, 2013

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL