Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Backreaction

"Chicken, Chicken, Chicken"

8 Comments -

1 – 8 of 8
Anonymous Navneeth said...

Chick,
Chicken chicken chick-chicken chicken chicken, chicken chickChicken chicken chicken chicken chicken.:)

10:56 AM, October 17, 2007

Blogger Bee said...

Chickens, missed it - but I read the paper ;-)

- Chick

PS: I think I've heard that talk a thousand times before. Just replace 'chicken' with 'pion' or 'spin-foam'.

11:01 AM, October 17, 2007

Anonymous Uncle Al said...

Spell check.

PI assimilated Lenny Susskind You now dare not call the string longer than wide - that's discrimination! All dimensions are equal.

12:14 PM, October 17, 2007

Anonymous Quasar said...

LOL chicken!

5:03 PM, October 17, 2007

Blogger stefan said...

:-)

A great talk including a backup slide for a perfect answer to a very good question!

5:14 PM, October 17, 2007

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I went to a different talk. That one went, "Bullshit boring Bullshit boring, Bullshit boring Bullshit boring, therefore Bullshit boring Bullshit boring. Any questions?"

9:29 PM, October 17, 2007

Blogger Bee said...

Any questions? yeah... why did you stay? If I had to choose between bullshit and boring, I'd choose bullshit, at least it's more entertaining. But boring bullshit is of the worst kind.

8:52 AM, October 18, 2007

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Not even bullshit"?

4:28 PM, October 18, 2007

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
OpenID LiveJournal WordPress TypePad AOL