No clothes that advertise sexual orientation? What? I don't even get that? ANd why was it so hard for them to let her in? Did they HAVE to be so petty?
The thing that bothered me at the time when I originally posted about KK's situation is that KK had been dressing as a woman since the beginning of her JUNIOR year.
I wasn't aware at the time that they let a female student into the prom wearing a tuxedo.
The prom is a one time in your life magical rite of paasage event. Once it's gone, you can't get it back.
Clothes that advertise sexual orientation. . . That would be a boy wearing a tux and a girl wearing a dress, right? WTF?
12:21 AM
[Image] (Gary, IN, December, 12, 2007) — In court papers filed today in the Northern District Court of Indiana, Lambda Legal says that West Side High School violated Kevin "K.K." Logan's First Amendment rights when it barred him from his prom for wearing a dress.
K.K. Logan attended West Side High during his junior and senior year and expressed a deeply rooted femininity in his appearance and demeanor. Both classmates and teachers at the school supported him in his daily attendance dressed in clothes typically associated with girls his age.
However, on May 19, 2006, Principal Diane Rouse stretched her arms across the door of the Senior Prom, blocking Logan's entrance. His classmates and friends rallied to his defense to no avail — even though a female student was allowed entrance dressed in a tuxedo.
Principal Rouse has stood by a school policy that deems inappropriate any "clothing/ accessories that advertise sexual orientation, sex, drugs, alcohol, tobacco, profanity, negative social or negative educational statements."
"The fact that sexual orientation is lumped in with drugs and profanity in the school's dress code is just plain offensive, but even more troublesome is that the whole policy is in violation of students' First Amendment rights," said James P. Madigan, Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago. "There are ways to write policies that both create rules for student behavior and also respect their rights — but this isn't one of them."
[Image]Lambda Legal argues that Logan's First Amendment rights were violated, including the freedoms of speech, symbolic action, and expressive conduct. The school district also engaged in unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex and gender.
"I dress this way because it's who I am and how I feel on the inside," says Logan. "Gay and trans students have rights, and they should be treated fairly."
The case is Logan vs. Gary Community School Corporation et al.
James Madigan, Staff Attorney in Lambda Legal's Midwest Regional Office in Chicago and Cole Thaler, Staff Attorney for Lambda Legal's Transgender Rights Project are handling the case with co-counsel from the law firm of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP in Chicago.
posted by Monica Roberts at 5:58 AM on Dec 13, 2007
"KK Logan Strikes Back"
4 Comments -
No clothes that advertise sexual orientation? What? I don't even get that? ANd why was it so hard for them to let her in? Did they HAVE to be so petty?
7:41 AM
How can clothes advertise sexual orientation? Unless, of course, it's a lavender t-shirt that says "I'M A HOMOSEXUAL!" in big red letters.
9:11 AM
The thing that bothered me at the time when I originally posted about KK's situation is that KK had been dressing as a woman since the beginning of her JUNIOR year.
I wasn't aware at the time that they let a female student into the prom wearing a tuxedo.
The prom is a one time in your life magical rite of paasage event.
Once it's gone, you can't get it back.
1:31 PM
Clothes that advertise sexual orientation. . . That would be a boy wearing a tux and a girl wearing a dress, right? WTF?
12:21 AM