Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Horrorthon

"Turistas"

16 Comments -

1 – 16 of 16
Blogger JPX said...

I respect your reasons for not liking the torture genre, but I thought this one was pretty effective. I really liked the underwater chase in the caves at the end, but I'm always a sucker for such clausterphobic things. Nice review!

October 04, 2008 12:39 PM

Blogger miko564 said...

It became a different movie half-way through JPX. I thought the movie after the escape was effective and pretty original, but I had already slipped into hatred by that time...

October 04, 2008 12:41 PM

Blogger JPX said...

I think you better avoid the SAW franchise, Cry Wolf, Hostel, and Wolf Creek!

October 04, 2008 12:51 PM

Blogger Landshark said...

Yeah, I've avoided that whole genre for just the reasons you've spelled out, miko.

October 04, 2008 1:34 PM

Blogger Catfreeek said...

I liked Hostile and the first 2 Saw movies ok but I thought Turistas was a bomb too. Just something about it that said uh....yeah to me.

October 04, 2008 1:46 PM

Blogger Whirlygirl said...

I recommend Wolf Creek.

October 04, 2008 1:51 PM

Blogger DKC said...

I veer away from this genre as well. I just don't have an interest in it at all.

October 04, 2008 3:07 PM

Blogger AC said...

i was riding the T last night with a colleague and we started discussing the 'thon, so of course he had a list of recommendations for me, including turistas, and that's when i gave him my "no torture porn" spiel. it may be the only sub-genre i totally avoid.

October 04, 2008 3:22 PM

Blogger miko564 said...

Shark, DCD, AC, I had no idea if I would find anybody who agreed with me on this one...

Well AC, let's hear your spiel!
I'd like to know if you avoid these things for the same reasons I do. (So sue me, I'm needy for affirmation. I need, I need!)

October 04, 2008 4:01 PM

Blogger AC said...

i do agree with you miko (don't i almost always?). i don't watch torture porn because it is too emotionally disturbing to me for exactly the reasons you state. i can handle a splatterfest but i just can't handle extended scenes of realistic cruelty/torture/vivisection. maybe this'll change over time but i doubt it. i suspect i'm just too damn squeamish or tenderhearted or both.

did you know turistas was a torture-porn movie when you picked it?

October 04, 2008 4:40 PM

Blogger The Mr. said...

kinda agree with dcd...gore for the sake of shock value...isn't scary or frighting to me....

October 04, 2008 5:09 PM

Blogger miko564 said...

I didn't pick it AC, it was on Encore or Cinemax.

I don't think squeamish has anything to do with it (I used to love TLC's Operation show). I've seen some nasty shit in my day (crime victims, car accidents, etc.), and I've been trained in violence myself. It's the feeling that somehow this whole genre is trying to make us complicit in the enjoyment of the torturer. I always felt that people capable of torture are a whole other level of crazy...the act of killing or hurting someone as an art, or method of sexual satisfaction. I guess I don't like the feeling of sharing emotions with such creatures.

Jesus, could I have made this anymore serious? Sorry. It's just a movie Miko, lighten up...

October 04, 2008 5:31 PM

Blogger AC said...

i completely share that sentiment, miko, but as i am not one of those people that can watch operations, i suspect that squeamishness is also part of the aversion to torture-porn in my case.

October 04, 2008 7:07 PM

Blogger Julie said...

I'm not interested in this sub genre, either.

And I really don't get ratings. Why is a naked woman getting dismembered an "R" rating? But I can't see two people just fucking the way the good lord intended unless I go to a seedy video store?

(I don't really want to see two people fucking, but I think I would rather see that than one person getting dismembered.)

October 04, 2008 10:23 PM

Blogger Octopunk said...

Yikes, I could never watch that TLC show, even for a second.

I don't think there are any fans of torture porn (as a subgenre) on this blog. However, I have to cite the first Hostel movie as pretty good, even while it made me feel like someone was stepping on my neck.

It's kind of what I said about that bad Lovecraft flickette not earning its chops to actually have a dead baby in it* -- if you have a movie made skillfully enough to support such extremes, then perhaps you've made something effective and worth watching.

If you're just going to gross people out, then yeah, that's not really fun.

*A bit off-topic, but I've always felt Basic Instinct's real flaw is that it's too stupid to justify edging into controversial zones.

October 05, 2008 8:17 PM

Blogger miko564 said...

Octo, I saw Hostel late one night on one of the movie channels and did not have the same visceral reaction of hatred that Turistas caused in me. I suppose it could go to your point, that it was a better movie and earned its violence cred. I think it was because it was SUPPOSED to be about the sadists that paid for the opportunity to enjoy the sexual satisfaction that the violence brought them.

I guess the best analogy I can make (unlike Jordan, I can't think of any examples off-hand) would be rape scenes in movies. If it is filmed to show the horror of the act or the depravity of the rapist, then it may be uncomfortable to watch, but you understand the scene. I have seen some rape scenes in movies, that looked like they were filmed for porn, as if they WANT you to find it arousing. That's F'ed up, and what I felt Turistas was trying to do with their nude surgery scene.

Last post on Torture/Porn for me. I am annoying myself with my seriousness.

October 05, 2008 9:28 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot