Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: Horrorthon

"Creepshow"

5 Comments -

1 – 5 of 5
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, BERNI WRIGHTSON! Right on.

The Swamp Thing material may be the best of his I've seen, but he also did a series of pictures for the second version of "The Stand" ("Complete and Uncut") that are rather less caricatured than his other work and also extremely haunting and frightening.

His "Creepshow" adaptation was great; I agree.

October 30, 2006 12:20 PM

Blogger Octopunk said...

I had the misfortune of finding the Creepshow comic adaptation in a bookstore before I saw the movie. Compared to Berni's fantastic art, the images from the movie are woefully disappointing. When Jordy Verrill spots the vegetation growing on his tongue, in the c-book they're creepy writhing tendrils but in the movie it's just a lump of green fuzz.

October 31, 2006 10:45 AM

Blogger Octopunk said...

I saw an outtake from this movie in which a loud airplane flies overhead while Leslie Nielsen and Ted Danson are talking on the beach. Leslie Nielsen stops in mid sentence and chases after it, firing his gun.

October 31, 2006 10:47 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Me too! I read the comic adaptation standing in the bookstore after school with my backpack on, ignoring the dubious stares of employees (as I did back then with a lot of stuff).

I agree the movie doesn't hold up to the Wrightson standard.

So often, you can look at the pre-production paintings for fantasy/sci-fi/horror movies, and say, Wow, that looks good; the stuff always makes the actual photographic material onscreen pale in comparison.

(Except for Lucas and Spielberg, the only guys who can make movies actually live up to pre-production paintings.)

(And maybe Terry Gilliam or Ridley Scott. But inconsistently.)

October 31, 2006 11:02 AM

Blogger JPX said...

I had that Creepshow poster in my bedroom for years.

I miss it.

November 02, 2006 4:55 AM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot