Now that I've seen it, I'm just more baffled that she's pulling some "I'm not a screen slut" thing over the first movie's money shot! Huh? HUH?
"Refused a body double?" Clearly she looks good naked and she wants to get some of that in a flick, again. Why not? More power to her, except for that denial thing. Other than that, she's been reasonably consistent, no?
Actually, I have no idea. I haven't been reading the press releases. Anyway, that was a smut smut smutty smut batch of film I just watched. Silly smut, too -- they sure milked the shot of the car jumping in the water, huh?
"Oh, but you know I'll rent it someday." The "unrated" adddtion, of course! I know, isn't it crazy that she's going all porno on us in this film? I'm actually surprised at how good she still looks.
February 07, 2006 4:07 AM
[Image] Wow, if there was ever any doubt about Sharon Stone doing any nudity in Basic Instinct 2, this trailer will end them. Full of full frontal shots and numerous scenes of sex, I can't imagine this getting an R-rating without tons of edits. Check it out here.
Wow, I called that one! Update: "Sharon Stone's latest movie is too sexy for cinemas. Censors in the US have had to cut a steamy orgy scene out of "Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction" so that teenagers can watch it reports Bang Showbiz.
Britain's Daily Star newspaper quotes a spokesman for the studio as saying: "It is a hard 'R' rated movie which means it includes strong sexuality, nudity, violence, language and some drug content." Censors threatened to give it the dreaded NC-17 rating which would mean that no-one under 18 could watch it.
Although they found the orgy scene too much, the MPAA did allow a steamy sequence where Sharon's character is pleasured by a man as she drives a sports car through the streets on London at high speed. Sharon reportedly refused to use a body double for the sex scenes."
"Basic Instinct 2 promo reel is X-rated!"
3 Comments -
She's in this??!! I didn't even notice that the first time this came up. I assumed with all her protests she wouldn't be in the sequel.
Unfortunately, I can't get to The Superficial.com at work. I know what I'll be doing around 5:25 today, though.
February 06, 2006 11:27 AM
Uh...uh...
Now that I've seen it, I'm just more baffled that she's pulling some "I'm not a screen slut" thing over the first movie's money shot! Huh? HUH?
"Refused a body double?" Clearly she looks good naked and she wants to get some of that in a flick, again. Why not? More power to her, except for that denial thing. Other than that, she's been reasonably consistent, no?
Actually, I have no idea. I haven't been reading the press releases. Anyway, that was a smut smut smutty smut batch of film I just watched. Silly smut, too -- they sure milked the shot of the car jumping in the water, huh?
Oh, but you know I'll rent it someday.
February 06, 2006 9:03 PM
"Oh, but you know I'll rent it someday." The "unrated" adddtion, of course! I know, isn't it crazy that she's going all porno on us in this film? I'm actually surprised at how good she still looks.
February 07, 2006 4:07 AM