Applications Google
Menu principal

Post a Comment On: the beat bike blog

"Things Worth Saving (Monday, Wednesday and beyond)"

2 Comments -

1 – 2 of 2
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The comments sections of newspaper websites that have covered the Milford incident are a case study of the stark contrast in opinion between the motor vehicle and bike worlds. The usual attitudes -- that bikes are an anachronism that don't belong on highways, that the cyclist is presumably a scofflaw himself and that cyclists and pedestrians assume the risk of whatever outrageous conduct those encased in multi-ton metal boxes might impose upon them when they venture onto the roads -- are rampant there, although people advocating for cyclists, pedestrians and the rule of law are well-represented, too. A large number of the comments simply won't believe the cyclist's allegation, even though the driver at least initially denied the incident occurred notwithstanding physical evidence linking his car to the crushed bike and, therefore, would seem to be the one with the credibility problem. Why the cops are skeptical enough not to charge one or more intentional criminal acts is hard to figure out from the reports.

Edgefield Avenue is a wide road with marked shoulders and is a recommended route on the ConnDOT bike map.

According to the state courts website, Melfi has another motor vehicle infraction charge pending, for unnecessary noise, for which he was ticketed in June.

If there is another side to the story, it may be presented in court when Melfi makes his next appearance next month. It's doubtful that the media will cover this case further.

It looks like the Glastonbury - Rocky Hill ferry loses about $200K a year. Between them, those towns could fill the gap at a cost of about $4 per resident, even if ticket prices aren't raised and there isn't a way to reduce operating costs. This is a fraction of the $7 to 10 million capital cost of adding a pedestrian and bike lane to the Putnam Bridge. Any suggestions about how one might argue that the ferry reduces miles traveled by vehicles via routes using bridges? Work happening now or planned on the Arrigoni and Putnam bridges may impel more people to use the ferry to avoid bridge backups.

July 25, 2011 at 12:34 PM

Blogger Interstatement said...

The G-RH ferry is part of state route 160. If we view it as an integral part of our state transportation system (which isn't a stretch), it actually recoups more of its cost than the other roadways in CT which collect no tolls and still require millions in upkeep. Fuel taxes and other direct motor vehicle-related revenues don't cover the majority of these costs. Taxpayers pay for the roads whether or not they ever set foot in a motor vehicle.

July 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM

You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot