If it even so much as looks cool, you can't have it, but Hollywood can. That's "equality under the law". You're just not as equal as they are, and it's your own fault, as far as the feds are concerned. "Shut up, Peon, nothing to see here, move on." One day, and the day will come.
1/02/2018 7:57 PM
[Image]
Talk about something that clearly infringes on the very arms that have “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia [or] that [are] part of the ordinary military equipment, or that … could contribute to the common defense.” Instead, we’re being asked to help provide cover to rationalize yet another Intolerable Act, and this one with the sanction of our “gun rights leaders.” [More]
If this doesn’t sit well with you, submit a comment on the proposed rule. I did.
I notice gunkapos supporting this have already started popping up in article comments, so feel free to express yourself there, too.
posted by David Codrea at 12:36 PM on Dec 29, 2017
1 Comment
Close this window Jump to comment formIf it even so much as looks cool, you can't have it, but Hollywood can. That's "equality under the law". You're just not as equal as they are, and it's your own fault, as far as the feds are concerned.
"Shut up, Peon, nothing to see here, move on."
One day, and the day will come.
1/02/2018 7:57 PM