I wonder if they would be as comfortable with a poll tax? Oh wait a minute! A poll tax is unconstitutional. How many other of your civil rights are taxed?
6/06/2016 5:35 PM
[Image]
And as for it being “constitutional,” the reason the feds went after a transfer tax instead of a ban is they knew they didn’t have authority to try for the latter. And as for that registration and tax, the district court in the Miller short-barreled shotgun case agreed that it was a violation of the Second Amendment. It was only after the government appealed to the Supreme Court and no attorney showed up to argue the case, and only the government’s side was heard, that the opinion cited in subsequent cases was issued. And even that had to concede a weapon was protected if it had “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia [or] that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.” [More]
If only we treat all guns the way we do machine guns, why we'd all be drinkin' that free Bubble Up and eatin' that rainbow stew.
1 Comment
Close this window Jump to comment formI wonder if they would be as comfortable with a poll tax?
Oh wait a minute! A poll tax is unconstitutional.
How many other of your civil rights are taxed?
6/06/2016 5:35 PM