1 – 8 of 8
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not a chance. Let us know if she even answers you.

Tolerance means what she says it means, now shut up, she doesn't want to hear you expressing your opinion. How intolerant can you be? Having your own ideas? Are you some kind of intolerant freak? Everybody knows her kind get to define tolerance.

Jeez David, didn't you known that? Yeah, me neither.

1/27/2006 1:06 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting note. Ironically, things that are 'implied' and 'expressed' are often very different (especially in regards to social acceptance). Instead of directly judging their attempt to make things safe for those that don't feel that they are (due to social structure and stereotypes), put yourself in their shoes. How would you handle being a white christian american male in a school full of american-hating islamic jihadist children. granted, its 'implied' that you are safe (even though you are socially different) but how do you think you would feel? Safe? I dunno....
The point is, the problem is not the sign. The fact that 'tolerence' needs to be 'expressed' in the form of a posted sign signifies other social problems. This is far from a matter of opinion, (difference between the writer and the school system) but the clashing of narrow minds from opposing schools of thought. Unfortunately, those with the power (school in this case) feel that posting a sign is more effective than going to the root of the problem. On the other hand, they have washed their hands of responsibilty to some degree, making their attempt equally worthless IMO. Instead of forcing 'tolerance' through the classroom, (since when did ethics 101 become required for graduation?) maybe some adults ought to sack up and start teaching their kids the concept of 'acceptance' (not tolerence, which is very different and useless, just like the sign) in an effort to break the 'fear' of someone/something different.
(...gets off soap box, puts on flame suit....)

1/27/2006 3:11 PM

Blogger David Codrea said...

No flames from this end, anonymous--what you say makes a lot of sense.

1/27/2006 4:14 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks.

1/27/2006 4:44 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hell no she wont. She is in control, and has the last say. And like we have all learned in history is that absolute power corrupts absoutly. Can you say dictatorship? I agree with you 100% Just a thought from a gun toating, liberal, HOMOSEXUAL!!!!!

1/27/2006 11:13 PM

Blogger Ben said...

This is one of those excercises or experiments where one is 99.999% certain of the outcome, but it has to be done nonetheless.

I'm confident that adding pro-life to the mix would push certainty to 100%.

1/28/2006 10:26 AM

Blogger David Codrea said...

Ben, you're right. I put this together without any planning and figured "pro-life" would be under the "religious" umbrella...

1/28/2006 11:05 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I emailed her and encouraged her to reply. I think everyone should!

1/28/2006 3:37 PM

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.

You will be asked to sign in after submitting your comment.
Please prove you're not a robot